My very talented friend Chris Walker has created an interactive visualization that illustrates the socio-economic upheaval that is consuming San Francisco, and reverberating around the country.
explores the relationship between private shuttle stop locations and indicators of neighborhood affluence. Private commuter shuttles are used by many large tech companies based in the South Bay.
It has a bunch of bells and whistles to boot. Highly recommend you give it a look.
Movement undertaken by a friend of a friend seeking to overturn the ban on snowboarding at Utah’s Alta ski resort. Alta is one of three ski areas not permitting use by snowboarders. Of the three, Alta is the only one on PUBLIC LANDS, which adds an interesting layer to the matter.
Not a hip hop buff, but I definitely do enjoy the good stuff. There seems to be a lot of good stuff here, passionweiss.com, a site by Jeff Weiss. Weiss wrote this awesome piece on rapper Kendrick Lamar, my jump off point for more of his work.
Interesting, potentially influential case: Supreme Court weighs how much one person should pay pornography victim
the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Paroline v. Unknown Amy, which involves the question of how much child pornography market participants should be individually required to pay for the harm to the subjects of the videos. (via verdict.justia.com
The case could be a game changer. Courts ruled that victims of such crimes deserve restitution, to be paid in this case by the persons who viewed the images. But what if it isn’t known how many viewed the images? How do you divide up the sum of the restitution between an unknown number of perpetrators? The decision the court is weighing is lumping the whole sum on the first perpetrator; let them deal with dividing it up between all other transgressors.
As much as I enjoy political commentary and the Meet The Press theme song, each weekend viewing grinds away my appetite for what is supposed to be the foremost television programs on politics. The staid structure, revolving door of guests, pre-scripted conversations, and cheap plays for “color” have nearly driven me to cutting the cord on them.
Thankfully, working at The Huffington Post introduced me to the work of our political reporter Jason Linkins. One of Jason’s duties is to watch the Sunday political shows, yeoman’s work indeed, and to report on the notable discussions or occurrences. A recent introduction to his column:
Good morning, everyone. Here is an idea I had: I thought I would wake up, watch the Sunday morning blather shows, type stuff as I watched them, put the stuff that I typed on the internet, do this until these shows were over, and then never ever do this ever again. Sound good to everyone? Actually, many of you are probably looking forward to this — the last time I liveblog the Sunday shows. My name is Jason.
Linkins does more than summarize: he distills and refines. He calls out inaccuracies, points to redudancies, provides context not given in the show, and question why the shows select the topics and guests they do.
Today, Sunday shows were all about Chris Christie’s bridge controversy. An important story indeed, but it would be hard to argue the remaining segments were pressing or of public importance. Linkins points out that not discussed was the chemical spill in West Virginia that has left 300,000 people without safe drinking water on the fourth day of the crisis.
As I watch the Sunday shows online or via podcast, I use up Internet juice to do so. It also taxes about 45 minutes of my attention. So now, Linkins column is where I go to first to find out whether any of the Sunday shows are worth the effort. There is yet reason to suspect that the Sunday shows may take a hint and retool their programs.
Notes from the day:
iOS Maps’ estimate of “time on foot” was accurate for once. A big win for an app I handle with much skepticism. Sure the directions were a bit ridiculous — ping-ponging from east to south at what seemed like each intersection — but the route yielded great views.
The Maps mission was capped off with an arrival at the dentist at the perfect time: no need to even take a seat in the waiting room. I even got an unscheduled cleaning in since the hygenist had a cancellation.
As one should, I sought to test drive the new teeth at a lovely Irish pub in the neighborhood. Great food and company.
My trek back to my neighborhood was a leisurely one, all the while not recognizing where I was but somewhat aware of the “vicinity” I was in. I practiced my new mode of foot travel that consists of trading sides of the street so as to stay on the sunny side of the street.
In Chinatown, I gained another occupant for my apartment.
His or her name is Barbary Coaster, because
Now catching up on the day…
There’s no such thing as cruelty-free cocaine, and people in Mexico are tired of footing the bill for US users. (via Quartz)
Americans started recycling back in 1690. With such an early start, you’d think they’d recycle more than 3% of their plastic. But, no. (via Quartz)
— Alexis C. Madrigal (@alexismadrigal) January 2, 2014
— The Cannabist (@CannabisCorner) January 2, 2014
“4.8 million Americans living under the federal poverty line will remain uninsured due to states opting out of the Medicaid expansion.”
I recently came across the work of data visualization expert Chris Walker, by way of his exploration of the state of Medicaid in America. It is a well-presented and poignant visualization of this important aspect of health care reform.
The health care overhaul expands Medicaid eligibility to those with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The Congressional Budget Office estimates 9 million people would gain coverage in the first year under these new criteria for qualification. The Medicaid expansion is already seeing success, a silver lining of the mired health care reform rollout. However, in 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that states could opt out of expanding Medicaid coverage to more of their poor residents. Thus, only 25 states and the District of Columbia have made Medicaid’s health care more widely available.
For what that means, see Chris Walker’s excellent visualization of what the impact of not expanding Medicaid to millions of Americans that need it.
Colin Jones and Lindsey Hankes were married on October 19, 2013. I know this because of Twitter. Twitter is also how I know Colin, an online newsman I have great respect for and a kind and supportive friend.
I was not at the wedding, but plenty of people that fall in both Colin and my networks did. Attendees took advantage of an apparent lack of ban on using social media during the proceedings.
Earlier today I was reading on Sherry Turkle’s argument that real human interaction is being lost due to the false belief digital media can convey it. Her position is well researched and concerning: something that anyone who uses digital media should be aware of.
But I have yet to reach the same conclusion. I think there are plenty of risks in using digital media. But on the other side of the coin is how it has affected my life on numerous occasions. It has connected me to so many new people and ideas. The conversations I have had were rich and valuable. As evidence that an online relationship doesn’t prevent the extension of the relationship to other channels, I have had the great opportunity to meet many who I first came to know through social media. Indeed, having connected on several levels has made the relationship all the more strong.
And take this weekend’s wedding: a wedding for people and attended by people I have not met in person before. Yet I was able witness (i.e. read) their experience, and to interpret their emotion through powerful updates from the event. I may have been near tears for some of them. All this from using “technologies that allow us to interact while inattentive or absent.”
I may have to abandon my claim that digital media is not going to be the end of humanity. Ha! Go get ‘em @TheStalwart.
That should probably have been “No longer BREAKING” with the appropriate capitalization. Now free of obligation to pass along “broken” news bits, my aim is to axe the word from my vocabulary. I have used it far too much for professional purposes (admittedly in personal uses as well), and I am not certain it is the best strategy for conveying information. I ask for my friends to keep me accountable on my word ban. I will need the support.
I have gotten so good at typing that word very quickly that I sometimes do it as a nervous tic: B-R-E-A-K-I-N-G; check if I left out the B, as I am wont to to do; hit ENTER. Tapped out on the counter or in my coat pocket.
In online news, especially the social blend, breaking fires the mega news alarm. It is understood to mean that a story is 1. big 2. a new report and 3. something that everyone is going to want to see. Thus, slap an easily recognizable all-caps word on it, let it fly, and watch the news crowd go bonkers. And it works! Being a breaker of news will make you seem smarter, faster, cooler, and a fast typer: traits sure to make you a big deal online.
But the term has become so overused and abused that it has been stripped of much value. Yet it is still widely used, as it was in my previous employment.
There are many new challenges and competitors for news sources these days. Among those competitors are media entities who pioneered shock and awe information. They have been in the business of luring eyeballs since the days when people still read print! And now news organizations are trying to beat them at their own game? Not a wise move in my view. Everybody is doing it, and everybody will look the same until someone breaks the mold and gets a leg up.
I think this is an opportunity for those in the news biz. Instead of tagging a report with a hot word, why not make the whole report hot? Find new ways to put the story and the medium to work for convincing the audience that your story has much more to offer than a flashy ornament slapped on another.
To hold myself to this experiment, I am going to go to the extent to eliminate the word “breaking” from my online communication, and to replace it with alternate and hopefully more compelling information. To up the ante, I offer anyone who catches me using the word online to a coffee at my expense.
Finally, I must mention that I mean no disrespect to my former employer, nor anyone who deals in breaking news. These folks are remarkably talented, and I respect their commitment to sharing information as soon as they have it. My hat remains off to all those in this boat.